Regina Daniels Fires Back at AGN President Over Alleged Health Claims and Family Attacks

Nollywood actress Regina Daniels has clashed publicly with Actors Guild of Nigeria (AGN) President Emeka Rollas following his comments about her personal and family life.

The feud began when Rollas, in a statement on Instagram on Thursday, suggested that many in the industry were aware of Daniels’ health status, yet spoke ill of her behind her back. He recounted an incident on a movie set, where senior actors, including Okey Bakassi, Chinyere Wilfred, and Jide Kosoko, reportedly observed her behavior and agreed she needed help. Rollas also criticized Daniels’ mother, Rita Daniels, for pursuing the AGN presidency, implying that family matters should take priority.

He further condemned Ned Nwoko for publicly raising Regina’s health concerns, asserting that such discussions had no place in the public sphere.

In response, Regina Daniels took to Instagram to defend herself and her family. She claimed Rollas’ bitterness stems from personal grievances, particularly his alleged attempts to bring women to her home for swimming lessons—a claim she firmly dismissed. Daniels also criticized Rollas’ leadership of the AGN, arguing that his tenure has seen little progress for actors and accusing him of enriching himself at the guild’s expense.

She wrote in part:

"AGN President, respectfully, there must be something wrong with you sir! To say I need help? You have no business spewing nonsense about my family or my mum, who always sung your praises… The only notable impact on the guild is the office you opened recently, after 7 years, and much criticism from people, who my family were major sponsors of."

Regina further praised her mother, Rita, as a deserving candidate for AGN leadership, citing her dedication and contributions to the industry. She described Rollas’ comments as an attempt to discredit her mother and diminish her achievements.

Opinion:
This exchange highlights the persistent tension between personal interests and professional responsibilities in Nollywood’s leadership structures. While Rollas may have intended to express concern, his approach—publicly discussing a young actress’ health and critiquing her family—appears both intrusive and poorly timed. Regina’s response underscores a broader issue: the need for transparency, professionalism, and respect in guild leadership.

The feud also draws attention to the challenges faced by women in the industry, particularly when navigating powerful figures. Rather than personal attacks, the focus should remain on the growth and welfare of actors, ensuring that guilds serve as advocates rather than arenas for grudges or personal vendettas.

Conclusion:
Regina Daniels’ bold rebuttal serves as a reminder that public figures, especially women, will stand firm against disparagement and misrepresentation. Moving forward, Nollywood stakeholders must prioritize integrity and accountability over gossip, ensuring that the guild and the industry thrive for the benefit of all actors.