Doris Ogala Levels Fresh Allegation Against Pastor Chris Okafor Amid Ongoing Feud
Nollywood actress Doris Ogala has made a fresh and serious allegation against Pastor Chris Okafor, founder of the Mountain of Liberation and Miracles Ministry, escalating a long-running public dispute that has continued to draw intense attention online.
Ogala made the claim in a video shared on social media, where she accused the cleric of sending her explicit videos allegedly involving his daughters. According to the actress, the incident occurred during a meeting at the University of Lagos (UNILAG).
In the video, Ogala directly addressed Pastor Okafor and dismissed claims that she was motivated by money or business interests.
“Pastor Chris Okafor, I don’t need your $50,000 or the shares in your company.
The day you came to see me in UNILAG, you sent me the naked videos of your daughters and I have forwarded them to VeryDarkMan.
I was shocked. I know what you are planning. You think you can set me up.”
The actress further claimed that she had forwarded the alleged materials to social media activist Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM).
This latest allegation follows months of online exchanges between Ogala and the pastor. In previous statements, the actress accused him of harassment and intimidation, while consistently insisting she has no financial, personal, or professional interest in him.
As of the time of filing this report, Pastor Chris Okafor has not issued any public response to the allegations contained in the video.
Opinion: A Disturbing Claim That Demands Caution and Due Process
The gravity of Doris Ogala’s allegation cannot be overstated. Claims involving explicit content and minors are extremely serious and deserve careful handling. While social media has become a powerful platform for speaking out, it is also a space where allegations can spiral rapidly without verification.
At this stage, it is important to stress that these are allegations, not established facts. Public opinion must be guided by restraint, allowing law enforcement and appropriate authorities to investigate thoroughly rather than allowing trial by social media.
For both parties, this prolonged public confrontation has now crossed into deeply troubling territory. If the claims are true, they raise urgent moral and legal questions. If false, they represent reputational damage of the highest order.
Ultimately, this situation underscores the need for formal investigation, transparency, and accountability, rather than online battles that leave the public confused and institutions weakened. Until verifiable facts emerge, caution — not outrage — remains the most responsible response.
